If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. safe distance to live from cell phone tower look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.
Although this may sound like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore safe distance to live from cell phone tower should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.